What is a Book of Authorities at Divisional Court in Ontario?

Share This Post

Share on facebook
Share on linkedin
Share on twitter
Share on email

KPA Lawyers - March 27, 2019

Although the Divisional Court hears appeals from many types of courts and tribunals, if you are specifically interested in appealing a decision of the Small Claims Court, then we recommend reading How to appeal a Small Claims Court case in Ontario before reading this article.

It is of great assistance to the Divisional Court for the parties to file casebooks containing copies of the cases to which they intend to refer on the hearing of the appeal. These cases are known as “authorities.”

The Appellant’s Book of Authorities must be bound front and back in white covers. The Respondent’s Book of Authorities must be bound front and back in green covers. If the appeal is before a panel of judges, each party should file three copies of its Book of Authorities. The Book of Authorities should include a tab for each case (either numerical or alphabetical), and should include an index of the cases and indicate the tab where the case is reproduced. The particular passages in the cases to which you wish to refer should be clearly marked with highlighting, underlining or sidebars.

The Book of Authorities should include only the cases that you have referred to in the Factum. The Book of Authorities should be filed, if possible, with the Factum, but if not possible, then not later than Monday of the week preceding the hearing of the appeal. If you and the respondent(s) agree, you can file a joint Book of Authorities.

The Divisional Court maintains a Judges’ Book of Authorities containing frequently cited authorities. If you are referring to a case in the Judges’ Book of Authorities, you do not need to include the full case in your Book of Authorities. However, you should include the extracts you intend to refer the judge(s) to in your Factum or your Book of Authorities. A list of the authorities in the Judges’ Book is available at www.ontariocourts.ca and at Divisional Court offices.

#BookofAuthorities #DivisionalCourt

More To Explore

Sharing Intimate Photos Without Consent Can Get You in A LOT of Trouble

KPA Lawyers – February 18, 2015 Information in today’s digital age travels at unprecedented speed, connecting us through digital devices across time and space. Digital technologies and their practices have become so ubiquitous that we often take for granted how intimately immersed we are in this information landscape. We never have to miss a beat: checking last night’s hockey scores; staying up to date

Ontario Human Rights Tribunal orders record award of $150,000 for injury to dignity to temporary for

KPA Lawyers – May 22, 2015 O.P.T. v. Presteve Foods Ltd., 2015 HRTO 675 (CanLII) [Re-posted from CanLii Connects.] Jose Pratas (pictured), the former owner of Presteve Foods, pleaded guilty to assault in 2009 and was given a conditional sentence and three years probation. The Ontario Human Rights Tribunal ruled that the owner of a fish processing plant in southern Ontario subjected two temporary

Do You Want To meet the team behind KPA?

Contact a lawyer in a matter of seconds!