Man sues Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario in Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario, loses

Share This Post

Share on facebook
Share on linkedin
Share on twitter
Share on email

KPA Lawyers - April 17, 2019

It’s almost reminiscent of an old internet meme.

On March 22nd, 2019, the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario decided the case of Gallagher v. Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.

Before we say anything further, it should probably be noted that neither KPA Lawyers nor any of our employees had anything to do with this case.

The Applicant, John Gallagher, alleged that he was subjected to discrimination by a Tribunal adjudicator because of disability and a failure to properly accommodate his disabilities in the course another lawsuit he filed at the Tribunal concerning an unrelated matter.

He even emailed the Tribunal stating that he should not to be required to make any written arguments and to be permitted to address any issues at an in-person hearing only. He did file medical documents in support of his request, except his medical documents did not actually indicate any such requirement. The Tribunal stated, “it is not apparent… why the Applicant’s disability renders him incapable to adequately responding…in writing, which I note he has already done”.

The Tribunal concluded, “it is plain and obvious to me that this Application raises allegations that are protected by judicial or adjudicative immunity, and is therefore outside of this Tribunal’s jurisdiction.”

#JohnGallagher

More To Explore

Sharing Intimate Photos Without Consent Can Get You in A LOT of Trouble

KPA Lawyers – February 18, 2015 Information in today’s digital age travels at unprecedented speed, connecting us through digital devices across time and space. Digital technologies and their practices have become so ubiquitous that we often take for granted how intimately immersed we are in this information landscape. We never have to miss a beat: checking last night’s hockey scores; staying up to date

Ontario Human Rights Tribunal orders record award of $150,000 for injury to dignity to temporary for

KPA Lawyers – May 22, 2015 O.P.T. v. Presteve Foods Ltd., 2015 HRTO 675 (CanLII) [Re-posted from CanLii Connects.] Jose Pratas (pictured), the former owner of Presteve Foods, pleaded guilty to assault in 2009 and was given a conditional sentence and three years probation. The Ontario Human Rights Tribunal ruled that the owner of a fish processing plant in southern Ontario subjected two temporary

Do You Want To meet the team behind KPA?

Contact a lawyer in a matter of seconds!