HRTO Dismisses Request for Reconsideration in Sexual Harassment Case

Share This Post

Share on facebook
Share on linkedin
Share on twitter
Share on email

KPA Lawyers - May 12, 2017

On June 16, 2014, Safari Anderson filed an Application under s. 34 of the Human Rights Code, which alleged that Giuseppe Alessandro, who owned Law Help Ltd., subjected her to sexual harassment, sexual advances and solicitations, and reprisal in the workplace, which resulted in her resigning from her job.

On August 18, 2014, the respondents filed a Response, which denied the applicant’s allegations. The respondents stated that they terminated the applicant’s services because of her poor work performance, and that she was making false allegations of sexual impropriety in order to extort money from the individual respondent.

The hearing took place on June 15 and 16, 2015. After Ms. Anderson presented her evidence, Mr. Alessandro decided not to call any evidence. The applicant and the individual respondent filed closing submissions/ arguments in writing in August and September 2015.

On December 28, 2016, the Tribunal issued a Decision, 2016 HRTO 1683 (CanLII), which upheld the Application. The Tribunal decided that the applicant had proven, on a balance of probabilities, that the individual respondent subjected her to several unwanted sexual advances and solicitations in the workplace, which also amounted to sexual harassment, and then subjected her to a reprisal for rejecting his sexual advances and solicitations, which forced her to quit her job. The Tribunal also found that the respondents were jointly and severally liable for the breaches of the Code, and ordered them to pay the applicant monetary compensation as a remedy.

On January 4, 2017, Mr. Alessandro filed a Request for Reconsideration of the Tribunal’s Decision. On May 8th, 2017, an adjudicator for the tribunal held, “In essence, the individual respondent is rearguing the case. Reconsideration is not available simply because a party disagrees with the Tribunal’s Decision, and it is not an opportunity for a party to reargue the case. The Request for Reconsideration is dismissed.”

Anderson v. Law Help Ltd., 2017 HRTO 511 (CanLII)

#SafariAnderson #GiuseppeAlessandro #humanrightscode #humanrightstribunal #sexualharassment

More To Explore

What to do if a seller doesn’t close a home sale in Ontario

In the real estate market, things can get tricky due to the substantial number of unknowns. Prices of property and homes can fluctuate relentlessly which can cause trouble in other areas of real estate. Sometimes, this can cause sellers, or purchasers to back out of a sale and leave the other party with nothing. If a seller has backed out of the sale without

Changes In Family Law: How Does It Impact You?

KPA Lawyers – August 23, 2021   The Canada Divorce Act changes took effect in March 2021. The changes came with significant adjustments in the divorce, parenting, and family obligations. The new changes are just receiving major updates since the last 20 years. The legislation attempts to make family laws simpler, accessible, and more efficient. It will also make family law more responsive to

Do You Want To meet the team behind KPA?

Contact a lawyer in a matter of seconds!